Menu
Chaco Vivo is not just another conservation project—it is a pioneering effort that sets the benchmark for REDD+ initiatives globally. As an Avoided Planned Deforestation (APD) project, Chaco Vivo operates with a level of transparency, accountability, and community involvement that is rare in the field. Unlike many other REDD+ projects, which often focus on mitigating unplanned and illegal deforestation, Chaco Vivo addresses legally sanctioned deforestation plans, making it a proactive force in the fight against climate change and biodiversity loss.
Chaco Vivo goes beyond traditional conservation efforts by integrating economic sustainability with environmental integrity, creating a replicable framework for success. The project combines cutting-edge technologies, robust scientific methodologies, and meaningful partnerships with local and Indigenous communities to ensure measurable impacts and equitable benefits. Its approach emphasizes not just preserving ecosystems but also addressing the systemic pressures driving deforestation, offering a model that aligns development goals with long-term climate and biodiversity commitments. This innovative strategy positions Chaco Vivo as a leader in advancing REDD+ projects with unparalleled effectiveness and integrity.
Chaco Vivo is distinct because it focuses on preventing legally planned and approved deforestation. This approach allows for more precise baseline measurements and more reliable carbon credit issuance, addressing one of the major criticisms of other REDD+ projects – the overestimation of carbon reductions. Chaco Vivo ensures its efforts are effective and verifiable by intervening before deforestation begins.
While both APD and AUD projects play crucial roles in reducing deforestation and mitigating climate change, APD projects are often preferred for their predictability, accuracy in baseline setting, and reliability in carbon credit issuance. APD projects can ensure their environmental impact is measurable and verifiable by targeting large-scale, legally sanctioned deforestation. This makes them a strong option for stakeholders seeking robust, high-quality carbon offsets. On the other hand, AUD projects excel in engaging with local communities and addressing the diffuse, often illegal, deforestation activities that occur at a smaller scale. The choice between APD and AUD projects depends on the specific goals and contexts of the stakeholders involved. However, for those prioritizing accuracy, predictability, and reliability, APD projects generally offer a more straightforward path to achieving significant, verifiable results.
At Chaco Vivo, precision and integrity are at the heart of every stage, from establishing baselines to monitoring carbon stocks. The project employs scientifically rigorous and conservative methodologies to calculate emissions reductions, ensuring the credibility and authenticity of the carbon credits generated. Continuous monitoring, supported by cutting-edge technology, and independent third-party verification provide an additional layer of assurance, guaranteeing that the environmental benefits achieved are both measurable and transparent. This unwavering commitment to excellence solidifies Chaco Vivo as a trusted leader in sustainable climate action.
Chaco Vivo places people at the heart of its mission, recognizing that lasting conservation is only possible when it uplifts and empowers the communities who call the forest home. By actively involving local and Indigenous populations in every stage of the project, Chaco Vivo ensures they share in the economic and social benefits of conservation. This inclusive approach not only strengthens the project’s sustainability but also sets a new standard for addressing social safeguards, countering criticisms often leveled at REDD+ initiatives. By prioritizing collaboration and equity, Chaco Vivo transforms conservation into a partnership for a better future.
Leakage, where deforestation activities are displaced to other areas, is a significant concern for REDD+ projects. Chaco Vivo mitigates this risk by engaging with surrounding communities and promoting sustainable land-use practices beyond its project boundaries. This holistic approach helps ensure that the project’s environmental benefits are not undermined by deforestation elsewhere.
One of the most significant criticisms of REDD+ projects is the overestimation of carbon savings. Chaco Vivo counters this by employing conservative assumptions in its carbon accounting and ensuring that every ton of CO2 saved genuinely represents real-world reductions. This transparency is critical for maintaining the credibility of the project and the broader REDD+ mechanism.
Learn more about Chaco Vivo’s conservative carbon estimates by visiting TransparenC.
Collaboration is at the heart of Chaco Vivo’s success. The project brings together a diverse array of stakeholders, including local communities, government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and international partners. By fostering strong partnerships, Chaco Vivo ensures that its conservation efforts are informed by a wide range of expertise and perspectives, enhancing both the effectiveness and sustainability of the project. These collaborations also help build local capacity, ensuring conservation efforts continue long after the project’s initial implementation.
Despite its potential, REDD+ has faced significant criticism. Concerns range from the quality of carbon credits to the social and environmental impacts on local communities. Chaco Vivo is designed to overcome these challenges
Join our Chaco Vivo community by signing up for our newsletter. Receive the latest updates on our conservation efforts, success stories, and how we’re making a positive impact on the environment and communities. Be a part of our mission for a sustainable future! Sign up now and stay connected.
Copyright 2024 © All Rights Reserved.
Legally sanctioned, planned deforestation (e.g., for agriculture, plantations
Unplanned, often illegal deforestation (e.g., small-scale logging, slash-and-burn agriculture
APD deals with clearly documented and planned activities, making the baseline more accurate.
High – Since deforestation is planned, outcomes and carbon savings are more predictable
Low to Medium – Outcomes are less predictable due to the spontaneous nature of deforestation
APD projects offer more reliable and verifiable carbon credit issuance due to predictable outcomes.
High – Baselines are based on planned
Medium – Baselines are harder to determine due
APD projects can set more accurate and conservative
High – Due to predictable outcomes and accurate baselines, carbon credits from APD projects are often more reliable deforestation activities, making them easier to calculate and verify
Medium – Carbon credits from AUD projects can be less reliable due to the unpredictability of unplanned deforestation to the unregulated nature of activities
APD projects generally produce more trustworthy carbon credits due to the structured nature of the deforestation they prevent.baselines, reducing the risk of over-crediting.
Often involves negotiations with commercial entities; community involvement may vary
High – Typically involves working closely with local communities to prevent deforestatio
While AUD projects are strong in community engagement, APD projects ensure more consistent involvement with defined stakeholders.
Large-scale, commercial deforestation activities
Small-scale, often subsistence-driven deforestation
APD projects can have a larger impact by targeting bigger deforestation activities.
Operates within a clear legal framework, often involving land zoned for non-forest use
Often operates in a more complex legal environment with varying levels of enforcement
APD projects benefit from working within established legal frameworks, which can simplify project implementation.
High – Due to predictable outcomes and accurate baselines, carbon credits from APD projects are often more reliable
Medium – Carbon credits from AUD projects can be less reliable due to the unpredictability of unplanned deforestation
APD projects generally produce more trustworthy carbon credits due to the structured nature of the deforestation they prevent.
| Organization | Acrónimo | Tipo de Org. | Point of Contact (POC) | Email o número de tel. | Email o número de tel. | Email o número de tel. | Email o número de tel. | Email o número de tel. | Email o número de tel. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ministerio del Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible
|
MADES |
GOB
|
Ethel Estigarribia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instituto Paraguayo del Indígena
|
INDI
|
GOB
|
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
Marlene Ocampos (ex presi) |
|
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
GOB
|
